Rapid natural hazard extent estimation from twitter data: investigation for hurricane impact areas
Natural Hazards, ISSN: 1573-0840, Vol: 120, Issue: 7, Page: 6775-6796
2024
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Natural hazards have occurred more frequently in the past years and pose a severe risk to human life. Their extents and, thereby, the most heavily affected areas must be estimated at the earliest to limit damages or initiate rescue services. For such estimations, a widely available data source, which is comparatively responsive to short-time changes, is needed and provided by volunteered geographic information (VGI) data. Tropical cyclones are natural hazard events that can cause enormous spatially extended damage. In this study, we introduce Machine Learning approaches such as Extremely Randomized Tree (ET) and Geographically Weighted Regression for estimating hurricane-impacted regions from VGI data. In addition to the general approximate track extent estimation, we also evaluate the possibilities of temporal estimation of track development from VGI data. Different scenarios are evaluated, and we find that the results mainly depend on the choice of the geographical splits for training and test data for the underlying regression task. Suitable splits lead to R of 99% in the best cases with the ET model. The estimation results are satisfying when considering the temporal aspect and represent a use-case scenario. Such a combination of Machine Learning approaches and VGI is a simple and fast approach for early natural hazard estimation.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know