Comparisons of filter, wrapper, and embedded feature selection for rockfall susceptibility prediction and mapping
Natural Hazards, ISSN: 1573-0840, Vol: 121, Issue: 2, Page: 1911-1943
2025
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
The selection of influencing factors is very important for the rockfall susceptibility prediction (RSP). To improve the reliability of rockfall susceptibility prediction, three feature selection methods were used and compared to select reasonable influencing factors. The three feature selection methods are filter, wrapper, and embedded, respectively. Filter methods are represented by ReliefF and chi-square, wrapper methods are represented by genetic algorithm (GA) and binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO), and embedded methods are represented by L-norm minimization learning (LML) and recursive features elimination (RFE). Taking Meizhou City, Guangdong Province, China as the research area, 21 factors are preliminarily selected to establish a rockfall susceptibility evaluation system. The above six feature selection methods are applied to optimize the combination of factors, and the contribution of each factor in different methods is analyzed. Then, based on the optimized factor combination, the random forest (RF) model is used to predict the rockfall susceptibility. Finally, the performance of the models is evaluated. The results show that the main influencing factors of the rockfall in Meizhou City are annual average rainfall (the importance is 0.130), distance to the road (0.109), and spring kernel density (0.094). The BPSO-RF model has the best performance for all the metrics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Accuracy (ACC), Recall (REC) and F1 Score (FS) of 0.891, 0.818, 0.805 and 0.822 respectively. Compared with the initial RF model, the AUC, ACC, REC and FS of the BPSO-RF model are improved by 2.7%, 4.5%, 4.5% and 4.4%, respectively. The model performance of wrapper methods represented by GA and BPSO is significantly better than that of filter and embedded methods. It can be inferred that the wrapper method is based on feature subset search and considers the mutual information between features, which makes the method better in removing redundant features and optimizing RSP.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know