On the optimization of n-sub-step composite time integration methods
Nonlinear Dynamics, ISSN: 1573-269X, Vol: 102, Issue: 3, Page: 1939-1962
2020
- 19Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A family of n-sub-step composite time integration methods, which employs the trapezoidal rule in the first n- 1 sub-steps and a general formula in the last one, is discussed in this paper. A universal approach to optimize the parameters is provided for any cases of n≥ 2 , and two optimal sub-families of the method are given for different purposes. From linear analysis, the first sub-family can achieve nth-order accuracy and unconditional stability with controllable algorithmic dissipation, so it is recommended for high-accuracy purposes. The second sub-family has second-order accuracy, unconditional stability with controllable algorithmic dissipation, and it is designed for heuristic energy-conserving purposes, by preserving as much low-frequency content as possible. Finally, some illustrative examples are solved to check the performance in linear and nonlinear systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85093938218&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-06020-8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11071-020-06020-8; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11071-020-06020-8.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11071-020-06020-8/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-06020-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11071-020-06020-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know