Dynamic tests for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in acromegaly
Pituitary, ISSN: 1386-341X, Vol: 11, Issue: 2, Page: 129-139
2008
- 22Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef21
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
In the vast majority of cases, basal serum GH and IGF-1 levels are markedly increased in patients with obvious clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is useful for diagnosis in the minority of patients who have weak GH hypersecretion. The cutoff for a "normal" GH nadir in the OGTT remains to be agreed. The type of GH assay, its sensitivity, the type of standard used by the manufacturer, the patient's age and especially gender, must all be taken into account. Recent studies using new highly sensitive assays suggest an upper normal GH nadir of 0.71 μg/l for female healthy patients, but no "universal" cut-off has yet been defined for healthy males (from 0.057 to 0.25 μg/l). The 1 μg/l cutoff proposed for the diagnosis of acromegaly in a 2000 consensus should be abandoned in favor of a 0.30 μg/l cutoff. Clinicians should know which assay is used, together with its sensitivity and the standard, before making therapeutic decisions. A more pragmatic view should probably be adopted when assessing the treatment response. Indeed, if "cure" is defined not with the <1 μg/l GH nadir but on the basis of healthy control values, many patients will not be considered controlled. However, the clinical relevance of such goal (e.g. achieving GH nadir <0.4 μg/l rather than <1 μg/l) in terms of prognosis and prediction of outcome on long term is not firmly established. Thus, from a pragmatic point of view, achieving a normal age-adjusted IGF-1 level and a GH nadir below 1 μg/l during OGTT will probably remain relevant for defining remission and good disease control in terms of morbidity and mortality in acromegaly. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=43049157987&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-008-0113-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18418712; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11102-008-0113-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-008-0113-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11102-008-0113-7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11102-008-0113-7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11102-008-0113-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know