Proximal fluorescence sensing of potassium responsive crops to develop improved predictions of biomass, yield and grain quality of wheat and barley
Precision Agriculture, ISSN: 1573-1618, Vol: 20, Issue: 2, Page: 379-397
2019
- 8Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Precision nutrient management requires accurate assessment of crop nutrient status. This is common for assessing N status, but much less so for other nutrients. Because fluorescence can indicate crop stress, the robustness of different fluorescence indices was assessed to predict crop nutrient status (K, Mg and Ca). The hypothesis was that crop nutrition limitations, especially K, can be detected using fluorescence proximal sensing to quantify crop response with a high degree of spatial resolution. A factorial experiment was imposed with four treatment factors: crop, K fertilizer rate, lime and row management. The soil at the experimental site was K deficient and the crop variables showed significant treatment effects (e.g. yield, protein). Fluorescence sensing identified a significant positive K response for three chlorophyll related indices (SFR_G, SFR_R and CHL), but not for FLAV; while wheat was significantly different from barley. Using a k-fold cross-validation method promising predictive relationships were found. The strongest predictions were for SFR_R to predict crop biomass, for SFR_G to predict crop K content of inter-row wheat, for CHL to predict crop Ca content of inter-row wheat and for FLAV with barley grain protein in the windrow treatment. The fluorescence indices produced more significant crop variable predictions than measuring NDVI using an active sensor. This study illustrates the utility of fluorescence sensing to measure chlorophyll related signals for capturing the nutritional status of barley and wheat crops. These results show encouraging potential to rapidly detect crop nutrient status for non-N nutrients using fluorescence sensing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059892656&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-09629-3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11119-018-09629-3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11119-018-09629-3.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11119-018-09629-3/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-09629-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11119-018-09629-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know