Quantum sealed-bid auction protocol with post-confirmation based on blind signature
Quantum Information Processing, ISSN: 1573-1332, Vol: 23, Issue: 3
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
Quantum sealed-bid auction protocol with post-confirmation is the one that ensures the fairness of the auction by verifying whether there is cheating after the winner is announced. To guarantee fairness, it is necessary to have both privacy and public verification simultaneously. In this paper, we make a first attempt to use the blind feature of the information in the blind signature to protect the bids’ privacy and use two-state vector formalism to achieve public verification. Compared to previous quantum sealed-bid auction schemes, the utilization of these techniques gives our scheme a novel and distinctive quantum flavor. Through analysis and comparison, our scheme can resist malicious bidder attacks as well as collusive attacks. In addition, the efficiency of our scheme is also considerable. Participants only need to prepare EPR states, not complex multi-particle entangled states, and even the auctioneer can be purely classical.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know