Famine and matching by socioeconomic status—evidence from the Great Chinese Famine
Review of Economics of the Household, ISSN: 1573-7152, Vol: 21, Issue: 3, Page: 855-912
2023
- 3Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, we investigate the effects of early-life exposure to famine on survivor matching by SES at the time of the first marriage. Based on a 2006 national survey, we exploit cross-region and cross-cohort variations in the intensity of exposure to the Great Chinese Famine to conduct a difference-in-differences (DID) based empirical analysis. We find that women exposed to famine in early life showed better matching outcomes in terms of different socioeconomic indicators than those not exposed to famine in early life. Additionally, the effects were more obvious and significant with family-level socioeconomic measures. As for men, compared with those without early-life famine exposure, men born during the famine had worse matching outcomes. Our findings further prove the gender differentials in mating preferences and matching outcomes in terms of SES. It also suggests that marriage in China is a family affair with spousal family characteristics being an important deciding factor.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know