Sleeping beauties in Computer Science: characterization and early identification
Scientometrics, ISSN: 1588-2861, Vol: 113, Issue: 3, Page: 1645-1663
2017
- 35Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
While a large majority of scientific publications get most of their citations within the initial few years after publication, there is an interesting number of papers—termed as sleeping beauties—which do not get much cited for several years after being published, but then suddenly start getting cited heavily. In this work, we focus on sleeping beauties (SBs) in the domain of Computer Science. We identify more than 5,000 sleeping beauties in Computer Science, and characterise them based on their sub-field and their citation profile after awakening. We also reveal some interesting factors which led to their awakening long after publication. Furthermore, we also propose a methodology for early identification of sleeping beauties, and develop a machine learning-based classification approach that attempts to classify publications based on whether they are likely to be SBs. The classifier achieves a precision of 0.73 and a recall of 0.45 in identifying SBs immediately after their year of publications, and the performance significantly improves with time. To our knowledge, this is the first study on sleeping beauties in Computer Science.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85031938375&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2543-3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2543-3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-017-2543-3.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2543-3/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2543-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2543-3
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know