Reconciling Observational Challenges to the Impulsive-Piston Shock-Excitation Scenario. I. Kinematic Challenges
Solar Physics, ISSN: 1573-093X, Vol: 297, Issue: 8
2022
- 3Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
Article Description
Until now, there is no consensus on the origin of coronal shock waves. Questions also remain about the patterns that govern the propagation of the presumably related disturbances observed in the extreme ultraviolet (EUV waves). We present arguments in favor of the initial excitation of the waves by the impulsive acceleration of erupting structures. We consider two puzzling events that have been known thanks to the efforts of different research teams. Using recent findings and our methods, we aim to determine what might actually have happened in these challenging events. In the first event, the expansion of the coronal mass ejection (CME) was determined by gravity starting from the low corona. The previous analysis led the authors to conclude about the flare-related origin of the associated shock wave. We also consider another event, in which an EUV wave had a strange kinematics. This was one of the weakest flares accompanied by EUV waves. Both of these challenging events have been reconciled in terms of an impulsively excited piston shock.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know