Precision Micromassive Forming of Microgears at Different Temperatures
Strength of Materials, ISSN: 1573-9325, Vol: 53, Issue: 1, Page: 55-64
2021
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
The precision micromassive forming of microgears was performed at different temperatures with the combination of wire electron discharge machining and precision forging. Microgear molds with 0.1-, 0.2-, and 0.4-mm modules and 12 teeth were fabricated with SODICK, AP250Ls, WEDM software, respectively, at a dimensional tolerance of ≤ 2.5 μm and surface roughness below 280 nm. The precision forging of microgears was investigated on T2 copper with the combination of simulation and experiment. The middle part was filled first, followed by the upper end and, finally, the bottom end. It was quite difficult to form microgears that meet the quality requirements at normal temperature. However, such a problem does not exist at 773 K, and the forming force required was only 36.4% as large as that at room temperature. Microgears formed with the high-temperature forging method exhibited high precision, and the dimensional tolerance was reduced from -38.8 μm of room temperature forging to + 0.9 μm, and the surface roughness was about 300 nm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104897380&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11223-021-00260-8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11223-021-00260-8; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11223-021-00260-8.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11223-021-00260-8/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11223-021-00260-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11223-021-00260-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know