Improved V-detector algorithm based on bagging for earthquake prediction with faults
Journal of Supercomputing, ISSN: 1573-0484, Vol: 80, Issue: 16, Page: 24605-24637
2024
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
With the highly nonlinear relationship between various seismic feature indicators and earthquakes, the researchers can hardly construct an earthquake model. Meanwhile, the lack of samples for destructive earthquakes also leads to inaccurate medium-to-short-term earthquake magnitude predictions. Therefore, this study proposes a novel model for earthquake prediction, named variant detector bagging algorithm (V-detector-bagging). First, we adopt the geological distribution of earthquakes and faults as a criterion to select the appropriate history catalog data area, and the seismic indicators are calculated through the Gutenberg–Richter laws and Panakkat indicators. Then, we propose the V-detector-bagging algorithm, which combines the V-detector algorithm with the bagging method. The proposed algorithm converts the self-tolerance process into a cycle process, during this process, different selves guide samples to spread widely, generate various detectors covering more wide nonself areas, fill holes that are not covered by detectors in nonself areas, and reduce the false negative rate. Thus, the V-detector-bagging algorithm improves the detection performance of the V-detector. Finally, through experimental validation analysis, the proposed algorithm ranked first in the detection rate on Sichuan and Xinjiang catalog data compared to the popular machine learning methods used in predicting earthquakes and the original V-detector algorithm, with Xinjiang yielding the best results.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know