Prognostic value of immunological profile based on CD8+ and FoxP3+ T lymphocytes in the peritumoral and intratumoral subsites for renal cell carcinoma
International Urology and Nephrology, ISSN: 1573-2584, Vol: 52, Issue: 12, Page: 2289-2299
2020
- 6Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef2
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Purpose: We aimed to assess an “Immunological Profile (IP)” including CD8+ and FoxP3+ T lymphocytes for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to evaluate its effects on tumor pathological characteristics, disease progression, and survival. Methods: Adjacent normal and intratumoral specimens from 42 patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy for RCC were analyzed for counts of CD8+ and FoxP3+ T lymphocytes by immunohistochemistry. Tissue from both sites were evaluated and scored separately according to low (0) or high (1) expression of CD8 and FoxP3. A total score (min: 0, max: 4) was assigned to each patient. Thereafter, patients were divided into two groups for clinicopathologic and survival stratification based on score (IP 0–2; and IP 3–4). Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and a multivariable Cox regression model was used for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The mean follow-up was 54.73 ± 21.34 months. Poor RCC characteristics including pT3–T4, tumor necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node involvement, and larger tumor size were significantly more common in the IP patients compared to IP (p < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that IP patients had worse OS (62.5 vs. 100%; p = 0.006) and PFS (50 vs. 94.4%; p = 0.002) compared to IP patients. In multivariable analysis, IP (HR 8.64; 95% CI 1.09–68.05, p = 0.042) and high tumor node metastasis stage (HR 45.33; 95% CI 4.69–437.68, p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of poor PFS. Conclusion: Assessment of IP including CD8+ and FoxP3+ T lymphocytes in adjacent normal and intratumoral sites in RCC may serve as a good predictive marker for PFS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089105321&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02592-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761342; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-020-02592-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02592-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11255-020-02592-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know