Responses of functional brain networks to bladder control in healthy adults: a study using regional homogeneity combined with independent component analysis methods
International Urology and Nephrology, ISSN: 1573-2584, Vol: 53, Issue: 5, Page: 883-891
2021
- 3Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Objective: A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was performed during urodynamic examination in healthy adults to determine the responses of functional brain networks to bladder control during urine storage. Methods: The brain imaging was performed in empty and full bladder states during urodynamic examination. First, we used independent component analysis (ICA) to obtain several resting state network masks, then the brain regions with significantly different regional homogeneity (ReHo) values between the two states were determined using a paired t test (p < 0.05; Gaussian random field correction [GRF]: voxel p < 0.01 and cluster p < 0.05) and presented in their corresponding resting state network (RSN) masks. Results: Data sets obtained from the remaining 20 subjects were analyzed after motion correction. Nine RSNs were identified by group-ICA, including the salience network (SN), default mode network (DMN), central executive network (CEN), dorsal attention network (dAN), auditory network (AN), sensorimotor network (SMN), language network (LN), visual network (VN), and cerebellum network (CN). The ReHo values were significantly increased (p < 0.05, GRF corrected) within the SN, DMN, and CEN in the full bladder state compared with the empty bladder state. Conclusion: Significant changes within the three functional brain networks were demonstrated when the bladder was full, suggesting that SN provides bladder sensation and DMN may provide self-reference, self-reflection, and decision-making about whether to void after assessment of the external environment, while CEN may provide support related to episodic memory, which provides new insight into the processing of bladder control and could serve as a premise to further explore the pathologic process underlying bladder dysfunction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100092818&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02742-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33523398; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-020-02742-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02742-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11255-020-02742-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know