Voiding efficiency: a predictor of failed trial off catheter after transurethral resection of prostate
International Urology and Nephrology, ISSN: 1573-2584, Vol: 56, Issue: 12, Page: 3759-3764
2024
- 9Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Purpose: Following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), there is no clear recommendation for the catheter duration, and objective criteria are needed to determine appropriate time for trial off catheter. Current study is aimed to identify the high-risk patients for failed trial off catheter and the association with preoperative voiding efficiency with postoperative failed trial without catheter. Methodology: This is cross-sectional single institutional study. All eligible patients who underwent TURP were followed preoperatively for symptoms and workup, including voiding efficiency based on ultrasound findings, intraoperatively for resection parameters, and postoperatively for a trial off a catheter. All the findings were documented, and the data were analyzed on SPSS(TM) 22. Demographic variables were calculated in the form of frequency and percentages. The association of voiding efficiency with failed trials off catheters was checked through Chi-square and binary logistic regression analysis. Results: 132 patients were included in the study. The mean voiding efficiency was 57.5%. Based on voiding efficiency cut off, of 50%, patients were divided into two groups. The association between voiding efficiency and failed trials off catheters was not found to be statistically significant, with a p value of 0.79. Only prevoid volume, postvoid volume, duration of symptoms, and upper tract damage were found to be statistically significant predictors of failed trial off catheter, with a p value of < 0.05.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197403389&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04128-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38935322; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-024-04128-z; https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_surg_surg/930; https://ecommons.aku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1929&context=pakistan_fhs_mc_surg_surg; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04128-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11255-024-04128-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know