Memory Coalescing Implementation of Metropolis Resampling on Graphics Processing Unit
Journal of Signal Processing Systems, ISSN: 1939-8115, Vol: 90, Issue: 3, Page: 433-447
2018
- 12Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Owing to many cores in its architecture, graphics processing unit (GPU) offers promise for parallel execution of the particle filter. A stage of the particle filter that is particularly challenging to parallelize is resampling. There are parallel resampling algorithms in the literature such as Metropolis resampling, which does not require a collective operation such as cumulative sum over weights and does not suffer from numerical instability. However, with large number of particles, Metropolis resampling becomes slow. This is because of the non-coalesced access problem on the global memory of the GPU. In this article, we offer solutions for this problem of Metropolis resampling. We introduce two implementation techniques, named Metropolis-C1 and Metropolis-C2, and compare them with the original Metropolis resampling on NVIDIA Tesla K40 board. In the first scenario where these two techniques achieve their fastest execution times, Metropolis-C1 is faster than the others, but yields the worst results in quality. However, Metropolis-C2 is closer to Metropolis resampling in quality. In the second scenario where all three algorithms yield similar quality, although Metropolis-C1 and Metropolis-C2 get slower, they are still faster than the original Metropolis resampling.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know