Comparative Study of Iron-Oxidizing and Sulfur-Oxidizing Bioleaching Processes for Heavy Metal Removal and Nutrient Leaching from Pig Manure
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, ISSN: 1573-2932, Vol: 231, Issue: 2
2020
- 7Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The potential of using iron-oxidizing and sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process for removal of heavy metals (HMs) was investigated at initial unadjusted pH of pig manure (PM). The indigenous iron-oxidizing and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms enriched from PM were primarily Alicyclobacillus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, respectively. After 12 days of bioleaching, 95% of Cu, 96.5% of Zn, 93.6% of Mn, and 92.7% of Cd were removed from the PM in sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process. Besides, 92.9% of Cu, 94.1% of Zn, 91.9% of Mn, and 90.5% of Cd were removed in iron-oxidizing bioleaching process. Furthermore, 18.1% of TN, 63.3% of TP, 65.4% of TK, and 45.6% of TOC were leached from the PM in the sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process, whereas only 21.6% of TN, 32.8% of TP, 4% of TK, and 49% of TOC were solubilized in the iron-oxidizing bioleaching process. The X-ray diffraction analysis results demonstrated that there was a large amount of sulfur remained in bioleached manure from the sulfur-oxidizing process which poses a potential risk of soil re-acidification. The Standards, Measurements and Testing Program extraction protocol study on fraction of P in PM showed that the amount of bioavailable P in the sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process was dramatically declined, whereas it was elevated by 25.9% in the iron-oxidizing bioleaching process. The results obtained in this study indicated that both the sulfur- and iron-oxidizing bioleaching process were able to efficiently remove HMs from PM at initial unadjusted pH, whereas the iron-oxidizing process was proved better method in reserving the fertilizing property and more friendly to the environment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077895903&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-4415-3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11270-020-4415-3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-020-4415-3.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-020-4415-3/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-4415-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-020-4415-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know