Stabilization and Management of Sulfate-Reducing Bioreactor Residues After Acid Mine Drainage Treatment
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, ISSN: 1573-2932, Vol: 232, Issue: 10
2021
- 2Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Passive and semi-passive sulfate-reducing bioreactors (SRBRs) are attracting increasing attention worldwide for the treatment of contaminated mine effluents. This study focuses on the management of post-treatment residues from these bioreactors. The residues of two bioreactors with different medium compositions were studied after they were mixed with different alkaline amendments (25% biomass ash, 30% aluminum red mud, 10% lime kiln dust, or 15% hydroxyapatite). Weathering cell tests showed that aluminum red mud and Bedford lime kiln dust efficiently maintain the leachate at neutral pH (≥ 7.0) and immobilize some metals (Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in the post-treatment residues with average dissolved concentrations < 0.5 mg/L for all toxic metals, except for Mn, which are less than 3.2 mg/L. Column tests were also performed on the unamended post-treatment residues under unsaturated, saturated, and immersed conditions. The storage of the post-treatment SRBR residues under saturated and immersed conditions preserved the reducing conditions of the media and the neutrality of the leachate pH and also limited the leaching of metals retained by the bioreactor media. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115801218&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05325-7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11270-021-05325-7; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-021-05325-7.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-021-05325-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05325-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-021-05325-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know