Historical changes in wetland management legislation and practices in Zimbabwe, and their implications
Wetlands Ecology and Management, ISSN: 1572-9834, Vol: 30, Issue: 6, Page: 1197-1211
2022
- 4Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study critically discusses historical developments in wetland management legislation through the twentieth century up to present in Zimbabwe, and how the legislative and management frameworks of different time periods have influenced wetland management strategies, including the needs and involvement of local wetland users. This analysis shows that in the twentieth century colonial era (up to 1980), laws prohibited the use of wetlands for some purposes and that local communities were largely excluded from using wetland resources. After independence in 1980, laws inherited from the colonial era were still applied despite the changed political and social situation, and this resulted in tensions between different wetland users. Since 2002, the Environmental Management Agency in Zimbabwe has regulated wetland use through licensing of wetland resource exploitation and through training of wetland users. However, this has not been effective and wetlands throughout the country have continued to be exploited for agriculture and by encroachment of urban infrastructure. There are also wider national-level tensions between the need for sustainable wetland management and conservation, and political imperatives for economic development by exploiting wetland resources. Balancing these issues underlies the challenges for wetland management in Zimbabwe and other developing countries. Based on this analysis, key recommendations are made regarding the need for closing legislative gaps in wetland management, inventorising and monitoring wetland properties, and engaging fully with community stakeholders.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know