Evaluation of Clostridium difficile Infection with PET/CT Imaging in a Mouse Model
Molecular Imaging and Biology, ISSN: 1860-2002, Vol: 22, Issue: 3, Page: 587-592
2020
- 5Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef1
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Purpose: Existing clinical or microbiological scores are not sensitive enough to obtain prompt identification of patients at risk of complicated Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Our aim was to use a CDI animal model to evaluate 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography ([F]FDG-PET) as a marker of severe course of infection. Procedures: CDI was induced with cefoperazone for 10 days followed by clindamycin 1 day before C. difficile inoculation. Mice were divided into wild type (n = 6), antibiotic without infection (AC n = 4), h001-infected (n = 5, ribotype 001), and h027-infected (n = 5, ribotype 027). Two days after inoculation, [F]FDG-PET was acquired. Weight, general animal condition, and survival were monitored daily for 9 days. Results: h001 group showed symptoms for 4 days with 0 % mortality and a similar colon uptake than control animals (h001 0.52 ± 0.20, WT 0.42 ± 0.07, and AC 0.36 ± 0.06). The h027 group showed symptoms up to 7 days, with 66.7 % of mortality 4 days after infection, and significantly higher colon uptake (0.93 ± 0.38, p < 0.05). Clinical score was associated to colon and cecum uptake (rho = 0.78, p = 0.0001) (rho = 0.73, p = 0.0003). Conclusion: High toxin producer ribotype 027 induced more severe CDI infections, correlating with higher colon and cecum [F]FDG uptake. Colon uptake may purportedly serve as early predictor of CDI severity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069194788&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01408-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31317298; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11307-019-01408-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01408-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11307-019-01408-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know