Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram from T1W, T1CE, and T2FS MRI for Improving Diagnosis of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma
Molecular Imaging and Biology, ISSN: 1860-2002, Vol: 24, Issue: 6, Page: 995-1006
2022
- 4Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Purpose: To compare values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences and propose clinical-radiomics nomogram for diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Procedures: This study enrolled 148 patients from Dec. 2017 to Feb. 2021. All patients underwent T1-weighted (T1W), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE), and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (T2FS) MRI scans. A total of 1967 radiomic features were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs) in each MRI sequence. Highly diagnostic radiomic features were selected with Mann–Whitney U test, elastic net, and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) based on MRI images. Logistical regression was used to build Rad scores. Clinical factors were analyzed using the chi-square test or Mann–Whitney U test. The performance of the Rad scores was judged using the area under the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The nomogram was developed by integrating the Rad score and the most important clinical factor. Results: By combining the three MRI sequences, the Rad-Com was developed consisting of twelve features selected by with Mann–Whitney U test, elastic net, and AIC: four from T1W, three from TICE, and five from T2FS MRI. The margin (P < 0.05) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between patients with benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors (STT). The nomogram was constructed by integrating the Rad-Com and margin, which yielded favorable diagnostic AUCs of 0.919 (sensitivity (Sen) = 0.784, specificity (Spe) = 0.936) and 0.913 (Sen = 0.923, Spe = 0.792) in the training and validation cohort. Conclusion: The proposed nomogram may have potential as a noninvasive marker for STS diagnosis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133594262&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01751-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35799035; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11307-022-01751-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01751-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11307-022-01751-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know