Responses of photosynthetic rates to temperature in two conifers dominating at different elevations
Landscape and Ecological Engineering, ISSN: 1860-188X, Vol: 18, Issue: 3, Page: 389-395
2022
- 4Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The elevational changes in vegetation are related to the changes in environmental factors, such as temperature. Evergreen conifers Abies veitchii and A. mariesii dominate the subalpine zone between 1600 and 2000 m and between 2000 and 2500 m above sea level (a.s.l.), respectively, in central Japan. This study examined why their dominating elevations are separated by investigating the temperature–photosynthesis relationship at high and low elevations (1600 m and 2300 m a.s.l.). This study tested two hypotheses: (1) the optimal temperature (T) for the maximum photosynthetic rate (P) is lower in individuals grown at high elevation than at low elevation, and A. mariesii has lower T than A. veitchii at each elevation; and (2) P of individuals grown at low elevation is greater in A. veitchii than in A. mariesii, while that of individuals grown at high elevation is greater in A. mariesii than in A. veitchii. Saplings of the two conifers were sampled at high and low elevations. The photosynthetic rate was measured at the laboratory. Contrary to the hypotheses, both species had the same T at two elevations, and P was greater in A. veitchii than in A. mariesii, irrespective of the elevation where the individuals grew. The elevational distribution of the two species could not be explained by the temperature–photosynthesis relationship. Therefore, factors other than the temperature–photosynthesis relationship are important to understand the elevational separation of the two species.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know