Evaluation of oxidative damage and Nrf2 activation by combined pollution exposure in lung epithelial cells
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, ISSN: 1614-7499, Vol: 27, Issue: 25, Page: 31841-31853
2020
- 14Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef2
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
The lungs are one the main organs exposed to environmental pollutants, such as tropospheric ozone (O) and particulate matter (PM), which induce lung pathologies through similar mechanisms, resulting in altered redox homeostasis and inflammation. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of these pollutants in the respiratory tract, there are only a few evidences that have evaluated the combined effects of outdoor stressors, despite the fact that humans are consistently exposed to more pollutants simultaneously. In this study, we wanted to investigate whether exposure to PM and O could have an additive, noxious effect in lung epithelial cells by measuring oxidative damage and the activity of redox-sensitive nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) which is a master regulator of cellular antioxidant defenses. First, we measured the cytotoxic effects of O and PM individually and in combination. We observed that both pollutants alone increased LDH release 24 h post-exposure. Interestingly, we did observe via TEM that combined exposure to O and PM resulted in increased cellular penetration of PM particles. Furthermore, we found that levels of 4-hydroxy-nonenal (4HNE), a marker of oxidative damage, significantly increased 24 h post-exposure, in response to the combined pollutants. In addition, we observed increased levels of Nrf2, in response to the combined pollutants vs. either pollutant, although this effect was not followed by the increase in Nrf2-responsive genes expression HO1, SOD1, GPX, or GR nor enzymatic activity. Despite these observations, our study suggests that O exposure facilitate the cellular penetration of the particles leading to an increased oxidative damage, and additive defensive response.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086103889&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09412-w; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32504424; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-020-09412-w; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09412-w; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-09412-w
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know