Uranium biosorption by hydroxyapatite and bone meal: evaluation of process variables through experimental design
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, ISSN: 1614-7499, Vol: 29, Issue: 53, Page: 79816-79829
2022
- 9Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Biosorption has been examined for the treatment of aqueous solutions containing uranium, a radiotoxic pollutant. Nevertheless, the evaluation of the role of process variables by experimental design on the use of hydroxyapatite and bone meal as biosorbents for uranium has not yet been previously addressed. In this study, the effects of adsorbent dosage (M), initial uranium concentrations ([U]), and solution pH were investigated, using a two-level factorial design and response surface analysis. The experiments were performed in batch, with [U] of 100 and 500 mg L, pH 3 and 5, and adsorbent/uranium solution ratios of 5 and 15 g L. Contact time was fixed at 24 h. Removal rates were higher than 88%, with a maximum of 99% in optimized conditions. [U] and M were found to be the most influential variables in U removal in terms of adsorption capacity (q). The experiments revealed that bone meal holds higher adsorption capacity (49.87 mg g) and achieved the highest uranium removal (~ 100%) when compared to hydroxyapatite (q = 49.20 mg g, removal = 98.5%). The highest value of q for both biomaterials was obtained for [U] = 500 mg L, pH 3, and M = 5 g L. Concerning the removal percentage, bone meal achieved the best performance for [U] = 500 mg L, pH 3, and M = 15 g L. Further experiments were made with real radioactive waste, resulting in a high uranium adsorption capacity for both materials, with 22.11 mg g for hydroxyapatite and 22.08 mg g for bone meal, achieving uranium removal efficiencies higher than 99%.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119826797&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17551-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816347; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-021-17551-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17551-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-17551-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know