The effect of China’s leading officials’ accountability audit of natural resources policy on provincial agricultural carbon intensities: the mediating role of technological progress
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, ISSN: 1614-7499, Vol: 30, Issue: 3, Page: 5634-5661
2023
- 18Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef16
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
China is one of the largest agricultural countries in the world. In the context of China’s efforts to achieve dual carbon goals (carbon peak and carbon neutral), the need for carbon emissions reductions in the agricultural sector cannot be ignored. This study collected 2007 to 2018 data from 30 Chinese provinces and used a difference in differences (DID) model to investigate the relationships between China’s leading officials’ accountability audit of natural resources policy (LOAANR), agricultural technological progress, and agricultural carbon emissions intensities (CEI). A common trend test, placebo test, PSM-DID, and other test methods were used to verify the reliability of the results. The results show that (1) compared with the non-pilot areas, the policy implementation could significantly reduce CEI; (2) the LOAANR was able to stimulate patented technological progress (ATI) and mechanical technological progress (AMT), but different types of technological progress had different mediation effect sizes; and (3) the policy effects shows obvious regional heterogeneity, manifesting as west > east > central; and the policy effects were more obvious in the non-major grain-producing areas, but had no inhibition effects on the CEI in the major grain-producing areas; compared with low intensity market-based environmental regulation (MER) regions, high-intensity MER regions have stronger LOAANR emission reduction effects. Based on the study findings, policy suggestions are given to reduce agricultural carbon emissions and promote higher quality agricultural development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136306614&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22465-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980529; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-022-22465-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22465-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-022-22465-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know