PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Gender differences in confidence during number-line estimation

Metacognition and Learning, ISSN: 1556-1631, Vol: 16, Issue: 1, Page: 157-178
2021
  • 33
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 41
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 6
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    33
    • Citation Indexes
      33
  • Captures
    41
  • Social Media
    6
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      6
      • Facebook
        6

Article Description

Prior research has found gender differences in spatial tasks in which men perform better, and are more confident, than women. Do gender differences also occur in people’s confidence as they perform number-line estimation, a common spatial-numeric task predictive of math achievement? To investigate this question, we analyzed outcomes from six studies (N = 758 girls/women and boys/men with over 20,000 observations; grades 1–5 and adults) that involved a similar method: Participants estimated where a provided number (e.g., ¾, 37) was located on a bounded number line (e.g., 0–1; 0–100), then judged their confidence in that estimate. Boys/men were more precise (g =.52) and more confident (g =.30) in their estimates than were girls/women. Linear mixed model analyses of the trial-level data revealed that girls’/women’s estimates had about 31% more error than did boys’/men’s estimates, and even when controlling for precision, girls/women were about 7% less confident in their estimates than were boys/men. These outcomes should encourage researchers to consider gender differences for studies on math cognition and provide pathways for future research to address potential mechanisms underlying the present gender gaps.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know