Numerical values of shape factors for field permeability tests in unconfined aquifers
Acta Geotechnica, ISSN: 1861-1133, Vol: 15, Issue: 5, Page: 1243-1257
2020
- 8Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Field permeability tests are used to evaluate the local hydraulic conductivity. Their interpretation requires knowing the value of a shape factor, c. Regular values for shape factors were obtained for fully saturated conditions in an infinite material. However, many tests are performed in unconfined aquifers, with a bottom impervious boundary, and partly unsaturated seepage. This paper questions the applicability of the regular c values to field conditions. It presents numerical ways to model field permeability tests in unconfined aquifers and deduce the c value, under steady and transient states, with partly unsaturated seepage. Two series of monitoring wells were analyzed and compared; they have either a filter pack or not. The influences of four variables (radial distance of the external boundary, dimensions and positions of the water injection zone, and aquifer material type) on the numerical c values were studied. The results show that the boundary radial distance markedly affects the numerical c value. Therefore, practical approaches were proposed by reconciling the numerical and realistic test conditions, to determine the representative boundary radial distances for each type of test model. Additionally, the numerical values are compared with the theoretical values of Bouwer and Rice (Water Resour Res 12(3):423–428, 1976) and Hvorslev (Time-lag and soil permeability in ground water observations, U.S. Army Eng Waterw Exp Stn, Vicksburg, 1951).
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know