Physical model tests and discrete element simulation of shield tunnel face stability in anisotropic granular media
Acta Geotechnica, ISSN: 1861-1133, Vol: 15, Issue: 10, Page: 3017-3026
2020
- 41Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The stability of excavation face in shield tunneling plays a key role for construction safety. The ignorance of soil anisotropy in most previous studies would induce inaccurate stability assessment. This paper studies the failure of shield tunnel face in cross-anisotropic granular media by physical model tests and discrete element simulation. Model tests were carried out on the tunnel face stability in anisotropic granular media, and initial anisotropy was generated by controlling the long axis of non-spherical particles. By conducting image analysis on the picture taken by HD camera, the failure mode of tunnel face was obtained. It consists of a sliding wedge and an overlying loosen area, and the inclination angle of sliding wedge varies with the bedding plane. The variation in limit support pressure with the intersection angle of the shield tunneling direction and the soil bedding plane was obtained. Discrete element simulation was further employed to study the tunnel face stability in cross-anisotropic granular media; the microscopic parameters were calibrated by fitting against the particle drop test and repose test. Clump particle consisted of three identical ball was used in the simulations, and its long and short axes were in accordance with rice particles. The obtained varying characteristic of limit support pressure with intersection angle from simulation is consistent with the test results, and the obtained failure mode is also similar to that of physical model test. The principal stress distribution at failure state was analyzed in the discrete element simulation, and the change of major principal stress direction from vertical to nearly horizontal in the loosen area clearly shows the formation of soil arches.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088575257&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01041-4; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11440-020-01041-4; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-020-01041-4.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-020-01041-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01041-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-020-01041-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know