Verifying a C-arm-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis protocol for assessing tibial implant movement in total knee arthroplasty
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, ISSN: 1741-0444, Vol: 60, Issue: 8, Page: 2389-2403
2022
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is the “gold standard” technique for measuring sub-millimetric relative motion between implant and bone to quantify post-operative implant migration over time. The vast majority of RSA studies addressing implant motion in knee replacements, however, have been conducted using expensive biplanar radiography systems and commercial software that are not readily available at many institutions. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of performing RSA using ordinary, readily available C-arm fluoroscopes and open-source software to assess tibial component migration. We developed an assessment protocol using a Siemens Arcadis Orbic C-arm and the open-source XROMM software and evaluated its accuracy and precision through a series of phantom-based verification tests. The results were highly promising: accuracies were in the range of − 39 to 11 μm for translations and − 0.025 to 0.029° for rotations, while system precisions ranged between 16 to 27 μm for translations and 0.041 to 0.059° for rotations. This performance is comparable to specialized RSA systems reported in the literature. The proposed RSA protocol is therefore capable of accurately measuring the relative motion of knee replacement implants in phantom scenarios, which justifies further the development of the protocol towards use in prospective clinical assessments of new implant designs and surgical techniques. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133074301&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02594-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35764909; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11517-022-02594-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02594-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11517-022-02594-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know