Optimal Policy for Remanufacturing Firms with Carbon Options under Service Requirements
Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, ISSN: 1861-9576, Vol: 31, Issue: 1, Page: 34-63
2022
- 9Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper studies the procurement management of carbon financial instruments and the production decisions for an emission-dependent remanufacturing firm under service requirements. In the presence of demand uncertainty, carbon emission options are introduced to hedge risks for the firm who purchases carbon financial instruments under a cap-flexible emission trading scheme (ETS) and then conducts remanufacturing. We develop three optimization models to determine the optimal remanufacturing quantity (procurement quantity of carbon financial instruments) maximizing the firm’s expected profit under three contracts: a pure wholesale price contract, a pure carbon option contract, and a portfolio contract. Through analyses and comparisons of optimal solutions, we demonstrate the values of introducing carbon options and committing to service levels for the firm. Compared with the other two pure contracts, the portfolio contract makes the firm better off. However, high service requirements may lead to a profit loss to the firm. We generalize to the cases when the yield rate is dependent on the quality of used products, when the yield is stochastic, and when carbon price performs volatility. Discussion of these extensions illuminates how the variability of used product quality, yield rate and carbon price influences the firm’s performances.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117814756&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11518-021-5512-6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11518-021-5512-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11518-021-5512-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11518-021-5512-6; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7134170&internal_id=7134170&from=elsevier
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know