First-pass perfusion of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with 64-detector-row CT: A study of technique repeatability and intra- and interobserver variability
Radiologia Medica, ISSN: 0033-8362, Vol: 119, Issue: 1, Page: 4-12
2014
- 10Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef2
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Purpose: This study was done to prospectively assess the repeatability and intra- and interobserver variability of first-pass perfusion with 64-detector-row computed tomography (CT) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a maximum diameter of up to 8 cm. Materials and methods: Twelve patients with NSCLC underwent 64-detector-row first-pass CT perfusion (CTP) of the whole tumour. Two different techniques were used according to lesion size (cine mode; sequential mode). After 24 h, each study was repeated to assess repeatability. Lesion blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), mean transit time (MTT) and peak enhancement intensity (PEI) were automatically calculated by two chest radiologists in two different reading sessions. Intra- and interobserver variability was also assessed. Results: The first-pass CTP technique was repeatable and precise with within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) of 9.3, 16.4, 11.2 and 14.9 %, respectively, for BV, BF, MTT and PEI. High intra- and interobserver agreement was demonstrated for each perfusion parameter, with Cronbach's a coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.99 to 1. Precision of measurements was slightly better for intraobserver analysis with WCV ranging between 1.05 and 3.03 %. Conclusions: Non-small-cell lung cancer first-pass perfusion performed with 64-detector-row CT showed good repeatability and high intra- and interobserver agreement for all perfusion parameters and may be considered a reliable and robust tool for assessing tumour vascularisation. © Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2013.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898544749&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0300-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24272480; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11547-013-0300-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0300-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11547-013-0300-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know