MR-enterography: role in the assessment of suspected anastomotic recurrence of Crohn disease after ileocolic resection
Radiologia Medica, ISSN: 1826-6983, Vol: 127, Issue: 3, Page: 238-250
2022
- 9Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Purpose: To determine the potential of magnetic resonance-enterography (MRE) in the assessment of the anastomotic status in patients with Crohn disease and prior ileocolic resection. Methods: A total of 62 MRE examinations obtained in 52 patients with Crohn disease who had previously undergone ileocolic resection were retrospectively reviewed by two readers in consensus. MRE features (anastomotic wall thickening, wall stratification, wall enhancement pattern and degree, DWI signal intensity, ADC values, lymph nodes, comb sign and complications) were compared to clinical, endoscopic and histological findings that served as standard of reference. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRE were calculated. Results: At univariate analysis, anastomotic wall thickening, anastomotic wall stratification, segmental wall enhancement, moderate wall enhancement, early and mucosal enhancement, and moderate/marked hyperintensity on diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI) were the most discriminative MRE features for differentiating between normal and abnormal anastomoses (p < 0.001 for all variables). Anastomotic wall thickening and segmental anastomotic wall enhancement were the two most sensitive and accurate MRE variables for the diagnosis of abnormal anastomosis with sensitivities of 82% (95% CI: 67–92%) and accuracies of 84% (95% CI: 72–92%). At univariate analysis, hyperintensity on DWI of the anastomotic site was the most sensitive finding for distinguishing between inflammatory recurrence and fibrostenosis (sensitivity, 89%; 95% CI: 67–99%). Conclusions: MRE provides objective and relatively specific morphological criteria that help detect abnormal ileocolic anastomosis, but performances are lower when differentiating between inflammatory recurrence and fibrostenosis. DWI may be useful in identifying pathologic anastomosis and, in particular, in distinguishing between inflammatory recurrence and fibrostenosis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123263410&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01452-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050452; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11547-022-01452-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01452-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11547-022-01452-1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know