Analysis of the implementation of a circuit for intra-operative superposition and comparison of the surgical outcomes using ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, ISSN: 1861-6429, Vol: 19, Issue: 12, Page: 2463-2470
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Purpose: This paper describes a novel circuit for intraoperative analysis with ICBCT in maxillofacial surgery. The aim is to establish guidelines, define indications, and conduct an analysis of the implementation of the circuit for intraoperative comparison of surgical outcomes in relation to 3D virtual planning in maxillofacial surgery. Methods: The study included 150 maxillofacial surgical procedures. Intraoperative actions involved fluoroscopy localization, intraoperative CBCT acquisition, segmentation, and superimposition, among other steps. Surgical times due to intraoperative superposition were measured, including time required for ICBCT positioning and acquisition, image segmentation, and comparison of 3D surfaces from the surgical planning. Results: Successful intraoperative comparison was achieved in all 150 cases, enabling surgeons to detect and address modifications before concluding the surgery. Out of the total, 26 patients (17.33%) required intraoperative revisions, with 11 cases (7.33%) needing major surgical revisions. On average, the additional surgical time with this circuit implementation was 10.66 ± 3.03 min (n = 22). Conclusion: The results of our research demonstrate the potential for performing intraoperative surgical revision, allowing for immediate evaluation, enhancing surgical outcomes, and reducing the need for re-interventions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195213995&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03196-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38829569; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11548-024-03196-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03196-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11548-024-03196-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know