A Lay Ethics Quest for Technological Futures: About Tradition, Narrative and Decision-Making
NanoEthics, ISSN: 1871-4765, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 233-244
2016
- 6Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef5
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
Article Description
Making better choices about future technologies that are being researched or developed is an important motivator behind lay ethics interventions. However, in practice, they do not always succeed to serve that goal. Especially authors who have noted that lay ethicists sometimes take recourse to well-known themes which stem from old, even ‘archetypical’ stories, have been criticized for making too little room for agency and decision-making in their approach. This paper aims to contribute to a reflection on how lay ethics can acquire more practical relevance. It will use resources in narrative ethics to suggest that in order to be relevant for action, facilitators of lay ethics interventions need to invite participants to engage in a narrative quest. As part of a quest, lay ethicists should be asked to (1) reflect on a specific question or choice, (2) use diverse (imaginative) input which is informative about the heterogeneity of viewpoints that are defended in society and (3) argue for their standpoints.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84982296404&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0273-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28042347; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11569-016-0273-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0273-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11569-016-0273-2; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11569-016-0273-2; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11569-016-0273-2.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11569-016-0273-2/fulltext.html; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11569-016-0273-2.pdf
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know