Globally optimized packings of non-uniform size spheres in R : a computational study
Optimization Letters, ISSN: 1862-4480, Vol: 12, Issue: 3, Page: 585-613
2018
- 16Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this work we discuss the following general packing problem: given a finite collection of d-dimensional spheres with (in principle) arbitrarily chosen radii, find the smallest sphere in R that contains the given d-spheres in a non-overlapping arrangement. Analytical (closed-form) solutions cannot be expected for this very general problem-type: therefore we propose a suitable combination of constrained nonlinear optimization methodology with specifically designed heuristic search strategies, in order to find high-quality numerical solutions in an efficient manner. We present optimized sphere configurations with up to n= 50 spheres in dimensions d= 2 , 3 , 4 , 5. Our numerical results are on average within 1% of the entire set of best known results for a well-studied model-instance in R, with new (conjectured) packings for previously unexplored generalizations of the same model-class in R with d= 3 , 4 , 5. Our results also enable the estimation of the optimized container sphere radii and of the packing fraction as functions of the model instance parameters n and 1 / n, respectively. These findings provide a general framework to define challenging packing problem-classes with conjectured numerical solution estimates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029011034&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11590-017-1194-x; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11590-017-1194-x; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11590-017-1194-x.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11590-017-1194-x/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11590-017-1194-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11590-017-1194-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know