Current Strategies and Future Perspectives for Intraperitoneal Adhesion Prevention
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, ISSN: 1091-255X, Vol: 16, Issue: 6, Page: 1256-1274
2012
- 128Citations
- 111Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations128
- Citation Indexes127
- 127
- CrossRef112
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures111
- Readers111
- 111
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Efficacy and Dose Ranging Study of Seroguard
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Phase II Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Efficacy and Dose Ranging Trial of the Drug Product Seroguard, Solution (JSC Pharmasyntez, Russia) Used
Review Description
The formation of peritoneal adhesions still is a relevant clinical problem after abdominal surgery. Until today, the most important clinical strategies for adhesion prevention are accurate surgical technique and the physical separation of traumatized serosal areas. Despite a variety of barriers which are available in clinical use, the optimal material has not yet been found. Mesothelial cells play a crucial physiological role in frictionless gliding of the serosa and the maintenance of an antiadhesive surface. The formation of postoperative adhesions results from a cascade of events and is regulated by various cellular and humoral factors. Therefore, optimization or functionalization of barrier materials by developments interacting with this cascade on a structural or pharmacological level could give an innovative input for future strategies in peritoneal adhesion prevention. For this purpose, the proper understanding of the formal pathogenesis of adhesion formation is essential. Based on the physiology of the serosa and the pathophysiology of adhesion formation, the available barriers in current clinical practice as well as new innovations are discussed in the present review.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X23038994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84861744130&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297658; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1091255X23038994; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know