Equipping the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Gastric Cancer with the 15-Node Minimum: a Population-Based Study Using Recursive Partitioning Analysis
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, ISSN: 1091-255X, Vol: 21, Issue: 10, Page: 1591-1598
2017
- 17Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef14
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
The recently proposed 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for gastric cancer (GC) did not include the evaluated lymph node (ELN) count as a prognostic indicator. In this study, we performed recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to objectively combine the 15-ELN threshold and 8th AJCC stage to refine the staging for GC. We analyzed 19,018 patients with non-metastatic GC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The dataset was randomly divided into training and validation sets. For each 8th AJCC stage, survival was significantly better for patients with ≥15 ELNs versus those with <15 ELNs ( P < 0.001 for all). RPA divided non-metastatic GC into seven stages: RPA-IA (8th AJCC IA with ≥15 ELNs), RPA-IB (IA with <15 ELNs and IB/IIA with ≥15 ELNs), RPA-IIA (IB with <15 ELNs and IIB with ≥15 ELNs), RPA-IIB (IIA with <15 ELNs and IIIA with ≥15 ELNs), RPA-IIIA (IIB with <15 ELNs), RPA-IIIB (IIIA with <15 ELNs and IIIB ≥15 ELNs), and RPA-IIIC (IIIB with <15 ELNs and IIIC). The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 84.1, 70.3, 52.8, 41.4, 32.9, 21.7, and 10.2%, respectively ( P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). The RPA staging outperformed the 8th AJCC staging in terms of discrimination and homogeneity among the SEER training and validation sets, as well as an independent Chinese cohort. By equipping the 8th AJCC stage with the 15-ELN threshold, the proposed RPA staging is superior to the 8th AJCC staging without overcomplicating.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X23022266; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3504-0; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026923245&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28752402; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1091255X23022266; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3504-0
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know