Training residents to employ self-efficacy-enhancing interviewing techniques: Randomized controlled trial of a standardized patient intervention
Journal of General Internal Medicine, ISSN: 0884-8734, Vol: 24, Issue: 5, Page: 606-613
2009
- 24Citations
- 87Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef15
- Captures87
- Readers87
- 87
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Training Doctors to Support Patient Self-Care of Depression
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Physician Training to Support Patient Self-Efficacy for Depression Care Behaviors CURRENT STATUS: Completed STUDY TYPE: Interventional SPONSOR AGENCY:University of California, DavisCLASS:Other
Article Description
Background: Current interventions to enhance patient self-efficacy, a key mediator of health behavior, have limited primary care application. Objective: To explore the effectiveness of an office-based intervention for training resident physicians to use self-efficacy-enhancing interviewing techniques (SEE IT). Design: Randomized controlled trial. Participants: Family medicine and internal medicine resident physicians (N∈=∈64) at an academic medical center. Measurements: Resident use of SEE IT (a count of ten possible behaviors) was coded from audio recordings of the physician-patient portion of two standardized patient (SP) instructor training visits and two unannounced post-training SP visits, all involving common physical and mental health conditions and behavior change issues. One post-training SP visit involved health conditions similar to those experienced in training, while the other involved new conditions. Results: Experimental group residents demonstrated significantly greater use of SEE IT than controls, starting after the first training visit and sustained through the final post-training visit. The mean effect of the intervention was significant [adjusted incidence rate ratio for increased use of SEE IT∈=∈1.94 (95% confidence interval = 1.34, 2.79; p∈<∈0.001)]. There were no significant effects of resident gender, race/ethnicity, specialty, training level, or SP health conditions. Conclusions: SP instructors can teach resident physicians to apply SEE IT during SP office visits, and the effects extend to health conditions beyond those used for training. Future studies should explore the effects of the intervention on practicing physicians, physician use of SEE IT during actual patient visits, and its influence on patient health behaviors and outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67349264880&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0946-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19296179; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11606-009-0946-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0946-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-009-0946-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11606-009-0946-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11606-009-0946-4
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know