A Digital Ethnography of Medical Students who Use Twitter for Professional Development
Journal of General Internal Medicine, ISSN: 1525-1497, Vol: 30, Issue: 11, Page: 1673-1680
2015
- 58Citations
- 39Usage
- 263Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations58
- Citation Indexes58
- 58
- CrossRef17
- Usage39
- Abstract Views39
- Captures263
- Readers263
- 263
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
#Twitter can boost medical students' education, AMA says
Some studies suggest that using Twitter may have a positive effect on medical students' educational and career development, according to the American Medical Association .
Article Description
BACKGROUND: While researchers have studied negative professional consequences of medical trainee social media use, little is known about how medical students informally use social media for education and career development. This knowledge may help future and current physicians succeed in the digital age. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore how and why medical students use Twitter for professional development. DESIGN: This was a digital ethnography. PARTICIPANTS: Medical student “superusers” of Twitter participated in the study APPROACH: The postings (“tweets”) of 31 medical student superusers were observed for 8 months (May–December 2013), and structured field notes recorded. Through purposive sampling, individual key informant interviews were conducted to explore Twitter use and values until thematic saturation was reached (ten students). Three faculty key informant interviews were also conducted. Ego network and subnetwork analysis of student key informants was performed. Qualitative analysis included inductive coding of field notes and interviews, triangulation of data, and analytic memos in an iterative process. KEY RESULTS: Twitter served as a professional tool that supplemented the traditional medical school experience. Superusers approached their use of Twitter with purpose and were mindful of online professionalism as well as of being good Twitter citizens. Their tweets reflected a mix of personal and professional content. Student key informants had a high number of followers. The subnetwork of key informants was well-connected, showing evidence of a social network versus information network. Twitter provided value in two major domains: access and voice. Students gained access to information, to experts, to a variety of perspectives including patient and public perspectives, and to communities of support. They also gained a platform for advocacy, control of their digital footprint, and a sense of equalization within the medical hierarchy. CONCLUSIONS: Twitter can serve as a professional tool that supplements traditional education. Students’ practices and guiding principles can serve as best practices for other students as well as faculty.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945484239&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3345-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25952652; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11606-015-3345-z; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/smhs_medicine_facpubs/595; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1595&context=smhs_medicine_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3345-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-015-3345-z; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11606-015-3345-z.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11606-015-3345-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know