Buckling Failure Analysis of Slender Composite Structure with Telescopic Boom and Truss
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, ISSN: 1864-1245, Vol: 24, Issue: 3, Page: 1404-1411
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Article Description
With continuous improvement of lifting height and operation range for all-terrain crane in engineering construction, the buckling failure analysis of slender boom composite structure has become a hot research direction in order to ensure the safety and efficiency. In this paper, eigenvalue buckling analysis and nonlinear buckling analysis under multiple loads are carried out on the boom system of telescopic boom and truss auxiliary boom. The results show that the instability will occur in the amplitude plane for slender structure with super-lift system. Meanwhile, as the increase in the elevation angle for boom structure, the buckling load value increases and the stability is enhanced. Compared with geometric nonlinear and eigenvalue buckling load, when the elevation angle of the boom is 70°, the difference can reach 72.53%. Moreover, geometric initial defects are introduced. Compared displacement–load curves and buckling load values with and without geometric initial defects, the influence on slender composite structure is smaller. The results show that in order to prevent the buckling failure of structure, the hoisting load should not exceed rated load when the elevation angle is small, which provides a basis for engineering design.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know