PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The “Normalization” of Intersex Bodies and “Othering” of Intersex Identities in Australia

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, ISSN: 1872-4353, Vol: 15, Issue: 4, Page: 487-495
2018
  • 101
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 106
    Captures
  • 7
    Mentions
  • 430
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    101
  • Captures
    106
  • Mentions
    7
    • References
      5
      • Wikipedia
        5
    • News Mentions
      2
      • News
        2
  • Social Media
    430
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      430
      • Facebook
        430

Most Recent News

ACT releases Australian-first draft law to protect intersex children from irreversible medical harm

PexelsThe Australian Capital Territory government has released a consultation draft law to protect the rights of intersex people. If passed, the bill would ban deferrable medical interventions on children with intersex traits until they’re old enough to decide treatments for themselves. There will be exceptions for emergency and urgently necessary procedures. The bill will criminalise unnecessary

Article Description

Once described as hermaphrodites and later as intersex people, individuals born with intersex variations are routinely subject to so-called “normalizing” medical interventions, often in childhood. Opposition to such practices has been met by attempts to discredit critics and reasserted clinical authority over the bodies of women and men with “disorders of sex development.” However, claims of clinical consensus have been selectively constructed and applied and lack evidence. Limited transparency and lack of access to justice have helped to perpetuate forced interventions. At the same time, associated with the diffusion of distinct concepts of sex and gender, intersex has been constructed as a third legal sex classification, accompanied by pious hopes and unwarranted expectations of consequences. The existence of intersex has also been instrumentalized for the benefit of other, intersecting, populations. The creation of gender categories associated with intersex bodies has created profound risks: a paradoxically narrowed and normative gender binary, maintenance of medical authority over the bodies of “disordered” females and males, and claims that transgressions of social roles ascribed to a third gender are deceptive. Claims that medicalization saves intersex people from “othering,” or that legal othering saves intersex people from medicalization, are contradictory and empty rhetoric. In practice, intersex bodies remain “normalized” or eliminated by medicine, while society and the law “others” intersex identities. That is, medicine constructs intersex bodies as either female or male, while law and society construct intersex identities as neither female nor male. Australian attempts at reforms to recognize the rights of intersex people have either failed to adequately comprehend the population affected or lacked implementation. An emerging human rights consensus demands an end to social prejudice, stigma, and forced medical interventions, focusing on the right to bodily integrity and principles of self-determination.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know