Impact of cone wall roughness on turbulence swirling flow in a cyclone separator
Chemical Papers, ISSN: 1336-9075, Vol: 76, Issue: 9, Page: 5579-5599
2022
- 23Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The influence of cyclone cone wall roughness on swirling flow characteristics is evaluated by considering different numbers of the inlet when the total flow rate is kept constant. Three-dimensional simulations are performed using the Eulerian–Lagrangian approach and RSM turbulence model. Effective parameters such as tangential and axial velocity distributions, turbulence intensity, pressure drop, particle collection efficiency, and erosion rate are investigated for the various number of inlets and different values of cone roughness. The results demonstrate that tangential and axial velocities are enhanced with the cone roughness. The pressure drop decreases with the cone roughness and increases with the inlet velocity. It is demonstrated that cutoff size diameter is affected by the number of inlets and cone wall roughness. For example, the three-inlet cyclone with a smooth-walled cone can collect 22.3-μm particles, while this cyclone collects 19.7-, 17.6-, 17-, 16.6-, and 16.2-μm particles when cone wall roughness is 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mm, respectively. Besides, it is observed that the collection efficiency is affected by the roughness slightly for the cone roughness ranging from 3 to 6 mm. The results demonstrate that the wall erosion rate is reduced with the cone wall roughness. It is maximum for the one-inlet cyclone and is minimum for a three-inlet one.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know