Safety of perioperative hemodialysis and continuous hemodiafiltration for dialysis patients with cardiac surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, ISSN: 1863-6705, Vol: 55, Issue: 2, Page: 43-49
2007
- 10Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef2
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
Objective. We have routinely used postoperative continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) combined with intraoperative hemodialysis (IHD) for dialysis patients undergoing open-heart surgery. This perioperative management could avoid any limitation of potassium concentration in the cardioplegic solution, strict restriction of fluid administration, or blood transfusion. Methods. To evaluate the safety of this strategy, 22 dialysis patients who underwent open-heart surgery (Dialysis Group) were retrospectively compared with 30 patients with normal renal function selected from the same time period with rigorously matched clinical characteristics such as age, gender, and operative procedures (Matched Group). Results. No significant difference was found in the operative variables such as the operative procedures, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic cross-clamp time in both groups. There were two deaths (9.1%) in the Dialysis Group compared with Matched Group (0%). In the Dialysis Group, the levels of serum potassium and creatinine were well controlled in the perioperative period with a mean duration of IHD and CHDF of 243.7 ± 60.6 min and 2.7 ± 1.1 days, respectively. In particular, no significant difference between intraoperative and postoperative levels of serum potassium was observed in the Dialysis Group (P = 0.09), whereas there was a significant increase in the Matched Group (P = 0.004). Mean volume administered for the first 24 h after surgery was not different from the Matched Group. There were no vascular access-related complications in the Dialysis Group. Conclusions. Postoperative CHDF combined with IHD can provide a similar management protocol for dialysis patients compared to patients with normal renal function. © 2007 The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33947545400&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-006-0072-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17444174; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11748-006-0072-8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-006-0072-8; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11748-006-0072-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11748-006-0072-8; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11748-006-0072-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know