Uncovering visual attention-based multi-level tampering traces for face forgery detection
Signal, Image and Video Processing, ISSN: 1863-1711, Vol: 18, Issue: 2, Page: 1259-1272
2024
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
With the rise of realistic face forgery techniques, the threat of identity fraud is more significant than ever. Several research works have focused on detecting such forgeries, but they extract forgery clues as a preprocessing step to the feature extraction phase of deep neural networks. A novel DenseTrace-Net architecture is designed in this manuscript to extract more comprehensive and refined face tampering traces locally and globally. Specifically, DenseTrace-Net extracts attentional multi-level tampering traces from facial images. A novel ‘Local Attentional Tamper Trace Extractor’ (LATTE) module extracts face tampering traces locally at the block level. A novel ‘Global Attentional Tamper Trace Extractor’ (GATTE) module aggregates multi-scale tampering traces globally. The LATTE and GATTE modules use visual depth attention to enhance their feature representation capability. Additionally, the proposed DenseTrace-Net is computationally lightweight with just 1.378 million parameters. DenseTrace-Net is evaluated on three benchmark datasets, the FF + +, CelebDF and DFDC datasets, achieving AUC scores of 0.9784, 0.9843 and 0.9916, respectively. These excellent scores allow the DenseTrace-Net to outperform the existing state-of-the-art face forgery detection methods comfortably.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know