Improving automated labeling with deep learning and signal segmentation for accurate ECG signal analysis
Service Oriented Computing and Applications, ISSN: 1863-2394
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Accurate automated analysis of ECG signals is essential for efficient heart health assessment. This study aims to develop a robust deep learning framework for precise ECG signal labeling. The approach combines signal segmentation and classification to enhance QRS complex and R-peak detection. A two-stage deep learning architecture was employed. The initial stage involves waveform segmentation using an LSTM network, optimized by the Fourier Synchrosqueezed Transform. The second stage identifies QRS complexes and R-peaks within segmented regions using a pre-trained deep learning model and a custom peak finder. The proposed method was evaluated on the QT Database, comprising approximately 15 min of ECG recordings from 105 patients. The proposed framework demonstrated superior performance in QRS complex detection compared to existing methods. Evaluation metrics, including precision, sensitivity, and specificity, were used to assess the model's accuracy. The hybrid approach effectively balanced the advantages of deep learning with traditional signal processing techniques, resulting in improved efficiency and reliability. The developed deep learning framework offers a promising approach for accurate and efficient ECG signal analysis. By combining signal segmentation and classification, the method effectively addresses challenges in QRS complex detection. The findings contribute to the advancement of automated ECG interpretation and have potential applications in various cardiac healthcare settings.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know