Optimization of PES/ZnO mixed matrix membrane preparation using response surface methodology for humic acid removal
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, ISSN: 0256-1115, Vol: 33, Issue: 3, Page: 997-1007
2016
- 21Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The application of response surface methodology (RSM) in preparation and optimization of membranes is important in order to reduce the effort and time needed to achieving an optimum performance. RSM was used to develop an optimum polyethersulfone (PES)/ZnO mixed matrix (MM) membrane for humic acid removal. The MMs were synthesized by dispersing various amounts of hydrophilic ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) into a solution containing PES, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and dimethylacetamide (DMAc). Flat sheet MM membranes were prepared via the phase inversion method using the central composite design (CCD). The effects of four preparation parameters, such as PES, ZnO, PVP weight percentages and solvent evaporation time, were investigated. Pure water flux (PWF), humic acid flux (HAF) and humic acid rejection (HAR) were selected as a model responses. It was shown that PES and PVP were mainly affected on both PWF and HAF. Furthermore, the interaction effect between PES and ZnO-NPs shows a significant effect on PWF, while the quadratic effects of both solvent’s evaporation time and ZnO-NPs weight percentage coupled with the interaction effect between PES and PVP weight percentage shows the most significant parameters that affects HAR. The optimization method was subjected to maximize all of the PWF, HAF and HAR. It was also determined that the optimized membrane can be synthesized from a solution containing 17.25 wt% PES, 3.62 wt% ZnO and 3.75 wt% PVP with 15 s of solvent evaporation time. The optimum values of PWF, HAF and HAR were 222.3 (L/m h), 94.7 (L/m h), and 96.34%, respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that the CCD technique is capable of optimizing PES-ZnO membrane performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84954547453&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-015-0221-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know