Non-invasive molecular genetic prenatal tests (NIPT) for detection of trisomy 13, 18 and 21
Medizinische Genetik, ISSN: 1863-5490, Vol: 31, Issue: 3, Page: 275-282
2019
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Background: Non-invasive molecular genetic prenatal tests (NIPTs) for trisomy have long been part of non-invasive prenatal diagnostics. In Germany it is currently being examined whether and for whom these tests should be paid for by statutory health insurance in the future. Objective: (I) Diagnostic properties of NIPTs for the detection of trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and (II) hypothetical calculation of the possible use of NIPTs in different groups. Methods: (I) Systematic search for primary literature and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and four other databases. Inclusion criteria: Studies in pregnant women; index test: NIPT using molecular genetic analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood to determine the trisomy risk; reference test: cytogenetic diagnostics or postnatal clinical examination. (II) Exploratory search. Hypothetical calculations for (1) all pregnant women following the current procedure without NIPTs using the example of first-trimester screening (FTS), (2) application in pregnant women with an increased risk (e.g., after preceding FTS), and (3) application of NIPT in a population with and without an increased trisomy risk. Results: In the 22 studies included, sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 detection were 99.13% (95% CI: [97.39%; 99.72%]) and 99.95% (95% CI: [99.88%; 99.98%]). The possible influence of test failures was not considered in the calculations, and thus the sensitivity or specificity of NIPTs may have been overestimated. For the detection of trisomy 13 and 18, the sensitivity could not be robustly estimated. Discussion: In pregnant women with an increased risk, NIPT can probably reduce the number of invasive tests and thus the number of test-related miscarriages.
Bibliographic Details
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know