A Comparative Study of Recent Non-traditional Methods for Mechanical Design Optimization
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, ISSN: 1886-1784, Vol: 27, Issue: 4, Page: 1031-1048
2020
- 165Citations
- 92Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Solving practical mechanical problems is considered as a real challenge for evaluating the efficiency of newly developed algorithms. The present article introduces a comparative study on the application of ten recent meta-heuristic approaches to optimize the design of six mechanical engineering optimization problems. The algorithms are: the artificial bee colony (ABC), particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, moth-flame optimization (MFO), ant lion optimizer (ALO), water cycle algorithm (WCA), evaporation rate WCA (ER-WCA), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), mine blast algorithm (MBA), whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and salp swarm algorithm (SSA). The performances of the algorithms are tested quantitatively and qualitatively using convergence speed, solution quality, and the robustness. The experimental results on the six mechanical problems demonstrate the efficiency and the ability of the algorithms used in this article.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067677553&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know