Assessing Economic and Shared Social Values of Forest Conservation to Improve Water Availability: A Case Study of the Protected Forest Reserve of El Quinini, Colombia
Small-scale Forestry, ISSN: 1873-7854, Vol: 21, Issue: 3, Page: 437-459
2022
- 2Citations
- 120Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Most of the rural population of developing countries depends on forest ecosystems; consequently, there is a myriad of trade-offs that jeopardize the ability of the forest to produce goods and services. To maintain the current forest cover and offer opportunities to improve rural livelihoods, more attention has been paid to the development of strategies to assess the plurality of values associated with ecosystem services. Stated preference methods have served to asses non-market values of ecosystem goods and services; nevertheless, they have been criticized for their inability to reflect social values and the limited stakeholder´s participation in the selection of attributes for valuation. The aim of this study was to asses shared social values associated with water provision to further integrate them as attributes for contingent valuation. The study was conducted in a small community in central Colombia. Shared social values, the values held in common by forest owners, were assessed through application of problem tree and participatory mapping techniques; and the willingness to pay method was used for economic valuation. Results showed that forest owners expressed their shared social values as three projects to aimed at enhancing the health of the forest in the reserve: environmental education, forest restoration, and agroforestry. The contingent valuation indicated that despite the very low income of forest owners (US$251.32 per month), there was a high support (74%) to pay an extra US$ 1.84 per month in the water bill to implement the projects. Our study presented a systematic procedure that combines methodologies to assess the multiple ways in which forest ecosystems are important to people. Ecosystem services have collective significance that can be assessed in small local communities to enable participation in policy making.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know