Management regimes in a coastal heathland –effects on vegetation, nutrient balance, biodiversity and gain of bioenergy
Journal of Coastal Conservation, ISSN: 1874-7841, Vol: 21, Issue: 2, Page: 273-288
2017
- 2Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Little is known about nutrient balances and the effect of different management measures on coastal heathlands, which differ in habitat structure and nutrient deposition from the more well-investigated inland heaths. This investigation aims at documenting management effects in a coastal heathland on the island of Hiddensee, northeastern Germany, and to recommend suitable management measures for this heathland type. Soil and vegetation samples were taken, and the development of vegetation was monitored after a number of restoration measures such as sod-cutting, choppering, Heirieten (= manual removal of over-aged Calluna vulgaris) and mowing. Effects from grazing were estimated based on own and literature data, and the possible effect of burning was calculated. Finally, the potential gain of renewable energy was considered. A positive correlation between mineral soil nutrient concentrations and share of grasses in the vegetation indicates increasing grass-encroachment due to eutrophication. Areas with heavily grass-encroached, overaged Calluna developed a vegetation poor in grass cover and with dense, healthy Calluna after sod-cutting, choppering, mowing and Heirieten. Nutrient balance calculations indicate that high-intensity measures (sod-cutting, choppering, Heirieten) counteract 450, 250 and 90 years of nutrient deposition, respectively. A combination of low-intensity measures such as mowing, sheep grazing, burning and regular shrub clearance is recommended to preserve a high biodiversity, to rejuvenate Calluna vegetation and to achieve a balanced nutrient budget in Baltic coastal heathlands, where atmospheric nutrient deposition is far lower than in western Europe. Contrary to inland heathlands, mowing seems to be sufficient even for an initial restoration of heavily grass-encroached areas.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85014536228&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0499-3; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11852-017-0499-3; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11852-017-0499-3.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11852-017-0499-3/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11852-017-0499-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11852-017-0499-3
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know