Treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma in patients not eligible for transplantation
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, ISSN: 1558-8211, Vol: 6, Issue: 2, Page: 113-119
2011
- 7Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef3
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
Melphalan plus prednisone (MP) has long been considered the gold-standard treatment for elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and it still forms the backbone for combinations based on novel agents. MP plus thalidomide (MPT), bortezomib (VMP), or lenalidomide (MPR), as induction plus maintenance, have proved to be superior to MP and are currently the treatment of choice for this population. Low-dose dexamethasone in combination with thalidomide and cyclophosphamide (CTDa) or with lenalidomide can be an alternative option for these patients. The benefit of these novel agents in terms of prolonged survival is accompanied by increases in treatment-related adverse events, however, which may be particularly pronounced in older individuals. In managing these patients, efficacy and toxicity should be balanced, and thus prophylactic measures to avoid adverse effects are mandatory. Moreover, reduced-intensity regimens are recommended for fragile or very elderly patients. Finally, the wide array of new treatment options will facilitate individualized treatment approaches, based on characteristics of the disease, patient comorbidities, and personal and social circumstances. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79957527693&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11899-011-0080-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347656; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11899-011-0080-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11899-011-0080-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11899-011-0080-3; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11899-011-0080-3; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s11899-011-0080-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know